Identifying the Most Likely Number of Visits in Customer Data

What is the most appropriate measure of central tendency to find the most likely number of visits in customer data?

a. Median
b. Mean
c. AvgDev
d. Mode

Final answer:

The mode is the measure of central tendency used to find the most likely number of visits in customer data, as it represents the most frequently occurring value in the data set.

Explanation:

When looking for the most likely number of visits from roughly 2.5 million customer accounts based on data such as total expenditures and number of unique visits, the measure of central tendency you would be looking for is the mode. The mode is defined as the most frequently occurring value in a data set. If a customer visits three times more often than any other number, then three is the mode. This is different from the mean, which is the arithmetic average of all data points, and the median, which is the middle value when all visits are listed in numerical order. Since the mode specifically focuses on the most recurrent frequency, it is ideal for identifying the number that appears most frequently in a list of how many times customers have visited.

In scenarios where the data set has outliers, the median would be a better indicator of central tendency, as it is not affected by extreme values. For example, if the company conducts a survey and calculates means and standard deviations, the mean would help estimate the population mean, but its accuracy can be impacted by outliers. The median would be a better representation of the central tendency in this instance. However, if the question purely aims to find the number that occurs most often, the mode is the best choice.

In summary, for finding the most likely number of visits among customer data, the mode is the appropriate measure to use, and this applies to sorting through a large company's customer account transactions or any other similar analysis of visit frequencies.

← Compound interest calculation let s see nancy s account balance in 24 years Understanding actual benefits in transactions →