If Zac's family sues the trampoline manufacturer in 2013, what is the basis for their lawsuit likely to be dismissed?
If Zac's family sues the trampoline manufacturer in 2013, their lawsuit will likely be dismissed based on the statute of limitations. Therefore, option A is the correct answer.
Understanding the Statute of Limitations
The statute of limitations refers to the timeframe within which a legal claim must be filed after the occurrence of an event or injury. Once this time period has expired, the injured party loses the right to bring a lawsuit. In this scenario, the trampoline was sold to Zac's family in 2010, and Zac's injury occurred in 2012. By 2013, it is highly likely that the statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit related to the trampoline collapse has already expired.
Comparison with Other Options
Options b, c, and d are not applicable in this context. The statute of repose (option b) sets an absolute deadline, typically based on the date of the product's manufacture or sale, regardless of when an injury occurs. No privity of contract (option c) refers to the requirement of a direct contractual relationship between the injured party and the manufacturer, which may not be necessary in product liability cases. Product misuse (option d) relates to the improper or unintended use of a product, which might affect liability but is not relevant to the dismissal of the lawsuit based on the statute of limitations.
Importance of Knowing Legal Time Limits
In conclusion, if Zac's family sues the trampoline manufacturer in 2013, their lawsuit is likely to be dismissed due to the expiration of the statute of limitations. It is crucial to be aware of and adhere to the applicable time limits for filing legal claims to preserve one's right to seek compensation for injuries or damages. Therefore, option A is the correct answer.