The Reflective Voices Against Slavery: Ignatius Sancho and Quobna Ottoba Cugoano
What were the different approaches taken by Ignatius Sancho and Quobna Ottoba Cugoano in advocating against slavery?
A. Cugoano calls for people to take small steps to end slavery, while Sancho asks for bold moves.
B. Cugoano appeals to his audience personally, while Sancho appeals to the greater public.
C. Cugoano is more willing to wait than Sancho, who is calling for immediate action.
D. Cugoano has a much more authoritative tone than Sancho, who is respectful to Sterne.
The correct answer is D. Cugoano has a much more authoritative tone than Sancho, who is respectful to Sterne.
Ignatius Sancho and Quobna Ottoba Cugoano were both influential figures in the fight against slavery in the 18th century. While both shared the same goal of abolishing slavery, they approached it in different ways.
Ignatius Sancho, born on a slave ship in 1729 and died in 1780, expressed his views through letters that he wrote to various individuals, including his friend Laurence Sterne. In his letters, Sancho discussed not only the issue of slavery but also touched on other political and social topics. His approach was more subtle and respectful, appealing to the intellect and emotions of his audience.
On the other hand, Quobna Ottoba Cugoano, born in Ghana in 1757, took a more forceful and direct stance against slavery. He did not shy away from demanding the immediate abolition of slavery in England, citing its unholiness and cruelty. Cugoano's approach was authoritative and uncompromising, urging for swift action to end the inhumane practice of slavery.
While Sancho's approach may have been more diplomatic and considerate, Cugoano's bold and commanding tone made a significant impact in rallying support for the abolitionist movement. Both men played crucial roles in raising awareness and advocating for the end of slavery, each using their unique voices to contribute to the cause.