Life in the Roman Countryside vs Crowded Cities

How did life in the Roman countryside differ from life in crowded cities?

Which statement below describes the difference between life in the Roman countryside and life in crowded cities?

A. Life for small rural landowners was easier in the countryside than in the cities.
B. Large countryside villas provided wealthy Romans with all the goods they needed.
C. Romans in poverty lived in the countryside, as they could not afford to live in cities.
D. Wealthy Romans had more power in the countryside than in cities, where plebeians dominated.

Answer:

B. Large countryside villas provided wealthy Romans with all the goods they needed.

Explanation:

In the Roman countryside, wealthy Romans lived in large villas that were equipped with all the necessary goods and resources. These villas provided a comfortable and luxurious lifestyle for the elite members of Roman society. On the other hand, life in crowded cities was less desirable, especially for plebeians who faced water problems, diseases, and overcrowding.

The disparity in living conditions between the countryside and cities demonstrates the stark contrast in quality of life between the wealthy and the less fortunate in Roman society. The availability of resources and space in the countryside allowed the wealthy to enjoy a more privileged life compared to the challenges faced by those living in crowded urban areas.

← The impact of the transatlantic slave trade on the caribbean The role of municipal courts in texas →