The Complex Relationship Between Political Machine Bosses and Voters in Late 19th Century Cities

What was the relationship between political machine bosses and voters in cities during the late 19th century?

Machine bosses tried to keep voter turnout low and offered bribes to improve communities, while publicly supporting voter-preferred candidates. In return, voters voted for the machine bosses' chosen candidates, but some voters undermined them by sabotaging their preferred candidates.

Which diagram best explains the relationship between political machine bosses and voters in cities during the late 19th century?

The diagram that best explains this relationship is D. Machine bosses tried to keep voter turnout low by offering bribes to improve communities and publicly supporting voter-preferred candidates. In return, voters voted for machine bosses' chosen candidates. However, some voters undermined the machine bosses by sabotaging their preferred candidates.

During the late 19th century, the relationship between political machine bosses and voters in cities was intricate. The machine bosses wielded significant power and influence, often using tactics to control voter turnout and maintain their political control.

Machine bosses employed strategies such as offering bribes to improve community conditions, which could help sway voters in their favor. They also publicly endorsed candidates that were preferred by the voters, creating a facade of democracy while still maintaining control behind the scenes.

In return for these favors, voters often supported the machine bosses by voting for the candidates they endorsed. This symbiotic relationship allowed machine bosses to maintain their hold on power and influence political outcomes in cities.

However, not all voters were loyal to the machine bosses. Some voters actively worked against the bosses by sabotaging their preferred candidates or challenging their authority. This dynamic between machine bosses and voters created a complex and sometimes contentious relationship during the late 19th century.

← The joyful decision of hart corporation Resident council meetings in extended care facilities →